Comments on: Ramaze and ActiveRecord http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26 about fetching, interpreting, and executing. Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:21:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Michael http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26/comment-page-1#comment-6280 Michael Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:10:51 +0000 http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/?p=26#comment-6280 @trey: Short answer: no for the post; yes for this reply. I tried using erubis by adding a config/initializers/erubis.rb and adding: <pre name="code" class="ruby:nocontrols"> require 'erubis/helpers/rails_helper' Erubis::Helpers::RailsHelper.init_properties = { :escape => true, :escapefunc => 'h' } </pre> With that, I get: <pre style="overflow: hidden"> Concurrency Level: 50 Time taken for tests: 5.965 seconds Complete requests: 1000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 13032035 bytes HTML transferred: 12407000 bytes Requests per second: 167.64 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 298.266 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 5.965 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 2133.43 [Kbytes/sec] received </pre> Which is significantly slower than standard erb. I haven’t yet found good info for further tweaking erubis, but if you know the way, please do advise and I will re-run benches. @trey: Short answer: no for the post; yes for this reply. I tried using erubis by adding a config/initializers/erubis.rb and adding:

require 'erubis/helpers/rails_helper'
Erubis::Helpers::RailsHelper.init_properties = { :escape => true, :escapefunc => 'h' }

With that, I get:

Concurrency Level:      50
Time taken for tests:   5.965 seconds
Complete requests:      1000
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Total transferred:      13032035 bytes
HTML transferred:       12407000 bytes
Requests per second:    167.64 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       298.266 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       5.965 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          2133.43 [Kbytes/sec] received

Which is significantly slower than standard erb. I haven’t yet found good info for further tweaking erubis, but if you know the way, please do advise and I will re-run benches.

]]> By: Trey http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26/comment-page-1#comment-6275 Trey Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:56:18 +0000 http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/?p=26#comment-6275 Did you use Erubis in rails? Did you use Erubis in rails?

]]> By: kez http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26/comment-page-1#comment-6272 kez Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:21:05 +0000 http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/?p=26#comment-6272 Nice work! I think people have been waiting for something like this for a while; I'm sure there will be a series of never ending rebuttals to this, but great to see your findings. Nice work! I think people have been waiting for something like this for a while; I’m sure there will be a series of never ending rebuttals to this, but great to see your findings.

]]> By: slabounty http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26/comment-page-1#comment-6271 slabounty Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:31:46 +0000 http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/?p=26#comment-6271 Very cool. It's nice to see an example with ActiveRecord and with the Rails comparison. Very cool. It’s nice to see an example with ActiveRecord and with the Rails comparison.

]]> By: coderrr http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/archives/ramaze-and-activerecord/26/comment-page-1#comment-6266 coderrr Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:45:21 +0000 http://ramblings.gibberishcode.net/?p=26#comment-6266 Awesome, thanks for using/linking to my patch. Lemme know if you run into any issues with it. Awesome, thanks for using/linking to my patch. Lemme know if you run into any issues with it.

]]>